Creator Economy vs. Computational Innovation

Creativity and innovation play a crucial role in building self-esteem. Engaging in creative activities provides a safe space for expressing thoughts and feelings, helping individuals understand themselves better and develop a strong sense of self-awareness

  1. Regular creative practice has been shown to have a direct, positive relationship with a child's self-esteem, regardless of artistic ability

  2. Moreover, sharing creative ideas with others teaches us that our unique perspectives matter, further boosting confidence

As AI continues to advance, it will become increasingly proficient at creative and innovative tasks. This evolution may lead to concerns about AI's impact on human creativity and self-esteem. In fact, a study found that 32% of respondents believe AI will negatively affect self-esteem, while 20% think it will have a negative impact on creativity

Can AI recognize innovation? In this talk, Dokyun Lee from Tepper School of Business of Carnegie Mellon University operationalizes arguments from the philosophy of creativity and theory of innovation literatures to argue that three different types of scientific innovation — combinational, exploratory, and transformative — can be distinguished by generative algorithms in an unsupervised, data-driven manner. Combinational innovations have grown at an exponential rate while creative innovations remain steady. Creative innovations have greater technological impact, but not market impact. He demonstrates that generative algorithms can identify different categories of human innovation, and underscores the potential utility of generative AI methods for business applications.

In response to these concerns, a new business idea called "Compettio" could emerge. Compettio would be a platform and marketplace for people to showcase their creativity and innovation through peer-judged competitions. This concept addresses several key points:

  1. Peer-to-peer judging: Participants would review and score each other's submissions using specific criteria such as illumination, engagement, difficulty, and creativity

  2. Diverse creative categories: Competitions could span various fields, including photography, music, art, and writing

  3. Transparent scoring system: A clear rubric would be used to evaluate entries, ensuring fairness and integrity in the judging process

  4. Community engagement: The platform would foster a sense of belonging and recognition among creative individuals

  5. Monetization potential: People would be willing to pay for participation, as it offers opportunities for self-expression, skill development, and potential recognition

Compettio would provide a space for human creativity to thrive in an AI-dominated world, allowing individuals to build self-esteem through peer recognition and creative expression. By focusing on human-to-human interaction and evaluation, this platform could help mitigate the potential negative impacts of AI on creativity and self-esteem while celebrating and nurturing human ingenuity.